feat: 拦截规则 allow/deny 命中也进审批记录(三种 action 全可观测)

此前只有 ask 命中会写 intercept_pending(审批记录);deny 直接拦下、allow 直接放行,
历史里查不到。现让三种 action 命中都留痕,便于观测:

- db: CreateDecidedIntercept —— 一条 insert 直接以最终状态(allowed/denied)落库并盖
  decided_at(复用 intercept_pending 现有合法状态,无需 schema 迁移)。
- intercept: Interceptor.Log —— 非阻塞、best-effort 记录一次规则命中(DB 出错不影响
  工具调用结果)。
- guard: deny 分支记 denied、显式 allow 规则命中记 allowed；无规则命中的放行不记,
  避免全量刷屏。

前端零改动:审批记录/历史页(interceptHistory=全状态、interceptTask=全状态)本就渲染
allowed/denied/pending;pending 过滤仅用于审批按钮区。

db/intercept.go

@@ -132,6 +132,31 @@ func (d *DB) DecideInterceptPending(id int64, status string) error {
 	return err
 }
 
+// CreateDecidedIntercept inserts an intercept_pending row ALREADY in a final state
+// (status = 'allowed' | 'denied'), decided_at stamped now. Used to log allow/deny
+// rule matches for observability — they don't block and need no user action, so unlike
+// CreateInterceptPending (which starts 'pending') this records the outcome directly.
+func (d *DB) CreateDecidedIntercept(ruleID, convID int64, taskID, agentName, toolName string, input []byte, status string) (int64, error) {
+	raw := json.RawMessage(input)
+	if len(raw) == 0 {
+		raw = json.RawMessage("{}")
+	}
+	var convIDPtr *int64
+	if convID != 0 {
+		convIDPtr = &convID
+	}
+	var taskIDPtr *string
+	if taskID != "" {
+		taskIDPtr = &taskID
+	}
+	var id int64
+	err := d.QueryRow(`
+INSERT INTO intercept_pending(rule_id, conversation_id, task_id, agent_name, tool_name, tool_input, status, decided_at)
+VALUES ($1, $2, $3, $4, $5, $6, $7, NOW()) RETURNING id`,
+		ruleID, convIDPtr, taskIDPtr, agentName, toolName, raw, status).Scan(&id)
+	return id, err
+}
+
 const interceptPendingCols = `id, rule_id, conversation_id, task_id, agent_name, tool_name, tool_input, status, decided_at, created_at`
 
 func scanInterceptPending(s interface{ Scan(...any) error }, p *InterceptPending) error {

guard/guard.go

@@ -93,8 +93,12 @@ func (g *Guard) applyIntercept(ctx context.Context, ev hook.Event) hook.Result {
 	}
 	switch dec.Action {
 	case "deny":
+		// 观测:deny 命中不阻塞审批,直接记一条 denied（历史/任务拦截页可见）。
+		g.interceptor.Log(ctx, intercept.ConvIDFromContext(ctx), dec, ev.ToolName, ev.Input, "denied")
 		return g.block(ev.ToolName, dec.Message, "")
 	case "allow":
+		// 观测:显式 allow 规则命中记一条 allowed（无规则命中的放行不记，避免全量刷屏）。
+		g.interceptor.Log(ctx, intercept.ConvIDFromContext(ctx), dec, ev.ToolName, ev.Input, "allowed")
 		return hook.Result{}
 	case "ask":
 		// If the worker context is already cancelled (task stopped / killed), block

intercept/intercept.go

@@ -329,6 +329,17 @@ func defaultMessage(action, name string) string {
 	}
 }
 
+// Log records an allow/deny rule match into intercept_pending as an ALREADY-decided
+// row (status = "allowed" | "denied"), for observability. Unlike HandleAsk it does NOT
+// block and needs no user action — it just makes every rule hit visible on the history
+// page (GET /api/intercept/history) and the task's intercept list. Best-effort: a DB
+// error is swallowed so logging never changes the tool call's outcome. The pending list
+// (status='pending') is unaffected, so it still shows only asks awaiting a decision.
+func (i *Interceptor) Log(ctx context.Context, convID int64, dec Decision, toolName string, input []byte, status string) {
+	taskID, agentName := taskInfoFromCtx(ctx)
+	_, _ = i.db.CreateDecidedIntercept(dec.RuleID, convID, taskID, agentName, toolName, input, status)
+}
+
 // HandleAsk creates a pending approval record and blocks until the user decides
 // (via /api/intercept/pending/{id}/decide) or the per-rule timeout elapses.
 // Returns true if the user approved.